6 people found this review helpful
1 person found this review funny
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 43.2 hrs on record (23.9 hrs at review time)
Posted: 2 Jan, 2019 @ 7:29am

Definately more Hitman Season 2 than anything resembling a proper sequel to the 2016's Hitman.

All the cutscenes have been reduced to partially animated story boards which, along with various other omissions and lack of improvements, reflects the shoestring budget of this release and absurd nature of the asking price. Simple but small details like "Hitman 2" weapons having a special little sticker to denote the difference from the first game's items feels extremely contrived and arguably lazy. Essentailly any complaints or potential omissions series fans have had from the 2016 Hitman are still absent here, essentially all you have here is some additional levels. It's Hitman Season 2.

There are marginal improvements to the scope of the some of the levels, however the core designs are no more complex than before, they simply take longer. Improvements to graphics are itterative improvements at best and really add nothing of substantial value to the core gameplay and performance tapers off more or less in line with any visual improvements, so not much of a technical achivement IMO.

Definately not worth the full asking price and the shifty presentation of the demo when other games don't make this mistake feel intentionally deceptive from the publisher. This all becomes painfully clear once you read the privacy policy. The privacy policy and EULA for this game are essentially hidden behind external account activation, which is required to unlock most of the games functionality (even in the demo), as others have noted this is something that should violate Steam's own store policy.

I love Hitman and I enjoyed playing additional levels of Hitman here in Hitman 2, however the publisher has taken many steps to deceptively represent the product, collect and sell your personal data and is simply charging full price for what would amount to DLC content for any other title.

They have chosen to include a "legacy" bundle which includes "remastered" levels from Hitman, however given the laughably similar nature of both games, even this seemingly value oritented inclusion comes off as a misrepresentatation after further consideration.

Overall the game is actaully quite a bit easier than the previous game, even on Master difficulty. Anyone well versed in the first title will find this immediate and apparent on even the first play through, moreso once you break down the levels.

Overall I would recommend this at a much, much, near zero dollar price point and it's a shame that anyone with privacy concerns can't rely on Steam to ensure the publisher is upfront about that. Warner Bros is probably the largest publisher of media (not specifically games) on the platform, so don't expect Valve to do anything about it.

Much like the first game, the publishing strategy has near ruined the product and the privacy situation is deceptive and unreasonable for any game, let alone at this price point. Grubby, greedy stuff from IOI, Warner Bros and Valve.


Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
4 Comments
milsugi 6 Jan, 2019 @ 4:01am 
how exactly do you know they're selling your data? Stop talking out of your ass
Dryspace 4 Jan, 2019 @ 11:54am 
I didn't tell you not to leave a neg. rating, I told you not to fund what you don't like. You're complaining about something that you're supporting--that you're literally funding with your own money.

You say you should be entitled to this or that, but we have to make decisions based on what life is like, not what it should be like. The fact is that green cash matters a lot more than red thumbs. You support practices with money, not ratings. If you don't want a practice, the only way to make it go away is to stop funding it.

If you scream and holler but still pay top dollar,
All a company hears is the money coming out of its ears


If you want to change the way I sell hot dogs, the only thing that will force me to change is to stop giving me money, because I am going to keep doing what makes money no matter how much people complain.

If you keep throwing money at these companies, don't expect the practices to go away. Expect them to keep getting worse.
Jett 4 Jan, 2019 @ 7:47am 
I was courteous enough to part with $100 which should entitle me to some level of assurance the developer is not going to onsell my personal data to line their pockets.

The goal of negative reviews is to create some type negative feedback around the game so that some of the poor choices made here are remediated in Hitman 3. It's also important to give others insight into the privacy and EULA issues so they can make an informed purchase.

I am pretty sure just because I have supported the product by way of purchasing it does not undermine my critisims of the game or my right to complain about shady business practices.

It's insistance from people like you not to share negative comments about the game that emboldens publishers to green these shady practices. More people should speak up, regardless if they bought the game or not.

Kids :csgogun::steamfacepalm:
Dryspace 2 Jan, 2019 @ 10:43am 
These practices persist and grow because you keep funding them with your money.

When a game is associated with a practice or design that I do not want to see, I wait until it's in the bargain bin, which means $20 max for ALL content, but usually much less (You'd be surprised how much less you "need" a game when you wait for the hype to die down. And a MP game that's dead in 6 months wasn't worth playing to begin with).

If you're not willing to make any sacrifices, at least have the courtesy to not complain about the very things you're supporting with your own money.