安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
But the higher win bonus will only create even more pressure, some people already leave if things looking bad and the higher the win bonus the higher the chance that people leave when they see they can't win.
How do you define the mvp?
That one guy holding the frontline, making space for the ranger ? the ranger that can delete every special/elite with no pressure since he's not threatened by a backstab every 2s ? most dmg ? most special / elites / player killed / disabled ?
So many possibilities to judge if a player was useful or not, and you'll need to adjust the weight of each category for each career because they're not here to fill the same role.
Giving better reward based on some random things doesn't look like a good idea. Some replay of the game could be fun but only if it doesn't delay the next game.