Steam for Linux

Steam for Linux

Best Linux distribution in 2024
whats the best one to use today
Początkowo opublikowane przez Kepos:
Wrong question in my eyes. Better would be to ask 'Best Linux distribution for me'...
There are several main distributions with interesting forks, but also independent ones availible. Have a look at Distrowatch [distrowatch.com] to see most frequented, news about, but also a mask to filter them for your needs.
So, what is 'best' in my eyes. Well, first of all, get used to one of the plenty desktops, watch out, which distributions core philosophy and weight mostly fits to your needs, combine them two and your list of possible candidates shrinks. Then cut out those that are only maintained by a handfull of people, because you want a bigger user base and friendly forums to ask question when you stumble over an issue.
I for myself migrated a couple of times, starting with the obvious Ubuntu, tested their forks Mate and Mint, before I finally found Arch based distributions to fit me the best. Actually I'm on Garuda Linux, because they are targeting for gaming support, working with Cinnamon DE (as an compromise) as I do not like the other availible DE's there. If you like the Arch way, give it a try, but if you are more familiar with one of the other main distributions, go ahead and find the one that suits you best. Linux is not a competition, but a common interest to have a free and trustworthy operating system. When it comes to gaming on Linux, try to avoid flatpak and snap for Steam, as they are known to use different paths, so some games get major issues.
< >
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 44 komentarzy
Gentoo obviously.
But better to use FreeBSD instead of Linux though.
Ostatnio edytowany przez: target_changelevel; 17 października o 7:41
Hazeezie 15 października o 7:22 
For gaming, I guess any rolling release distro is good enough
sweetiebot 15 października o 7:23 
arch btw
Visualvengeance 15 października o 7:25 
Oh ♥♥♥♥ here we go again....
Autor oznaczył ten post jako odpowiedź na oryginalny wątek.
Kepos 15 października o 7:30 
Wrong question in my eyes. Better would be to ask 'Best Linux distribution for me'...
There are several main distributions with interesting forks, but also independent ones availible. Have a look at Distrowatch [distrowatch.com] to see most frequented, news about, but also a mask to filter them for your needs.
So, what is 'best' in my eyes. Well, first of all, get used to one of the plenty desktops, watch out, which distributions core philosophy and weight mostly fits to your needs, combine them two and your list of possible candidates shrinks. Then cut out those that are only maintained by a handfull of people, because you want a bigger user base and friendly forums to ask question when you stumble over an issue.
I for myself migrated a couple of times, starting with the obvious Ubuntu, tested their forks Mate and Mint, before I finally found Arch based distributions to fit me the best. Actually I'm on Garuda Linux, because they are targeting for gaming support, working with Cinnamon DE (as an compromise) as I do not like the other availible DE's there. If you like the Arch way, give it a try, but if you are more familiar with one of the other main distributions, go ahead and find the one that suits you best. Linux is not a competition, but a common interest to have a free and trustworthy operating system. When it comes to gaming on Linux, try to avoid flatpak and snap for Steam, as they are known to use different paths, so some games get major issues.
Ostatnio edytowany przez: Kepos; 15 października o 7:31
Asha 15 października o 8:20 
There is no ‘best’ distribution. There are certainly bad distributions, but one should find that which most closely fits what’s required for its given purpose.
r.linder 15 października o 9:10 
I went from Mint, to Pop!_OS, to Arch (EOS, Garuda, CachyOS), and back to Pop!_OS because it was good enough to begin with, and now it has COSMIC

Rolling release is only really necessary for newer hardware that needs the latest drivers right away. But as a consequence, things can be less stable or not work as intended. Cachy has been described as fast, but tripping over its own laces.
Ostatnio edytowany przez: r.linder; 15 października o 10:31
i_nive 15 października o 9:58 
If a newcomer, the best distro is the one your friend (or the circle around you) runs.
Experiments needed otherwise.
Viphyte 15 października o 11:49 
I mainly use Fedora for everyday use.
Ostatnio edytowany przez: Viphyte; 15 października o 11:49
Xenophobe 15 października o 15:04 
for coming from windows into linux for the first time, linux mint with the cinnamon desktop environment. it's stable and has a very similar feeling to the windows desktop.
grzegorz77 15 października o 15:46 
For beginners steam and games, mint and pop os.
Once you have some experience with Linux, it's like Kepos wrote.
Stamper 15 października o 19:37 
Try em, try em all.
Make yourself a minimum of 4 partitions (but leave some space for system and boot partitions) (5or6 if you still want Windows)
1 Partition for your current favourite distro and daily driver.
1 Partition for potential next distro to replace your current and for playing without risk of breaking your daily.
1 Partition to test out other and new distros
1 Partition for Data (with your home directory) shared/mounted on the other distros.

As you install distros they may create smallish system partitions for Boot and backup/recovery etc. Just left them do it.
If you want to have Windows, I also suggest a 2nd NTFS partition for data, games, media etc. You can them mount the NTFS Data partition in any of the Linux Distros to access that data.
Now have fun. So much to explore so little time to do it.
You didn't want to have time to play games as well did you? ;)
Ostatnio edytowany przez: Stamper; 15 października o 19:39
petran79 16 października o 12:36 
there is no best distribution, but if your system can't handle it, there are lighter distributions for Steam. That would be like running Win10 games on lighter Windows XP.
grzegorz77 16 października o 14:38 
If you want to try multiple distributions, I recommend not separate partitions, but separate disks. Linux works fine, but windows is better to be on a different disk. When it comes to ntfs, it's better to be careful with it, I've never had problems with reading, but it's better to be careful with writing. Personally, I use fat32 to move things to windows.

When it comes to Linux, there is complete freedom. You can have a single boot partition for multiple kernels and init. But I prefer to have one partition with the bootloader, and each partition for the distribution contains system+boot. As for home, each distribution also has its home on its partition. But for some distributions I have mounted single directories from other partitions. Symbolic links also work well so as not to duplicate large things. Home directories contain settings for e.g. programs, and I have different settings for different distributions.

But linux is freedom of choice, let everyone have it organized as it is more convenient for them. The possibilities are endless. :p2chell:

edit:
Of course, using mbr sectors is completely different from using uefi. So this must also be taken into account.
Ostatnio edytowany przez: grzegorz77; 16 października o 14:41
Xenophobe 16 października o 17:14 
Początkowo opublikowane przez Ozwald:
What's the best flavor of ice cream in 2024?
rocky road ...
< >
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 44 komentarzy
Na stronę: 1530 50